2014 Kentucky Derby – Handicapping the Field

This Derby year is different from any since the start of this site in that the Derby will have one clear favorite. Handicapping often comes down to taking or trying to beat the favorite, or finding ways to get value out of the favorite. That’s why California Chrome is the “Decision” horse of this Derby, and the rest follows from there.

(One note: for my handicapping, the post-position draw and track condition are about 5-10% of the equation. I might discount a horse more drawing post 1 but not any other. Also, I believe distance considerations outweigh track conditions more in classic races, so the 20-40% chance of an off track doesn’t really factor into the Derby as much as other races. Thus, I’m comfortable that the following reasoning will hold for me throughout Derby week)

The Decision

California Chrome (Post-Time Odds Estimate: 5/2) (by Lucky Pulpit out of Not for Love mare)

 If your handicapping is limited to two factors – watching races and looking at speed figures – then California Chrome is an absolute standout. He has not been seriously challenged in winning three times this year and horses he has beaten straight up (Hoppertunity, Candy Boy and Chitu) have in turn beaten numerous other Derby contenders. He is a well-deserving favorite.

 Yet betting the Kentucky Derby often requires looking deeper into handicapping factors that would highlight a runner whose chances of winning are better than his odds indicate. On California Chrome, those deeper handicapping factors do not appeal to me. His pedigree suggests that his best distance is shorter than the 10 furlong Derby distance, all his stakes wins are in California, and he has not faced much adversity in his wins. To the last point, CC has been classier than all the speed horses he’s faced, and speedier than the class horses he’s faced. In the Derby, the frontrunners will be able to hold their speed longer than their California counterparts.

 All that said, I can’t argue that he’s the horse to beat. I think he will go off at odds of 5/2; if you think CC wins 30% of the time, these are fair if not great odds. 30% sounds about right to me, so he’s a top pick, but California Chrome winning is not the bet I want to make. I have opinions on the rest of the field that should be very different than the public’s, and these differences of opinion are what I want to put my money on.

 If I’m right on these, and California Chrome runs well, I’ll have a good day at the track.

 If I’m right on these, and California Chrome does not run well, I’ll have a great day at the track.

 If I’m wrong on these, I’ll lose (but there are no bad days at the Kentucky Derby).

 Tier 1 (Prime win candidates and key exacta/trifecta horses)

 When it comes to the Kentucky Derby, I consider myself a pedigree x performance handicapper. This means that, of horses that have shown some ability and class in the Derby preps, I want to pick horses whose pedigrees suggest success under the conditions of the Kentucky Derby. This is mainly distance aptitude but also includes finding influences that have had past Derby success. My top 3 picks have all had solid recent performances but their pedigrees suggest that their best runs remain ahead of them.

  Wicked Strong (PT Odds est: 6-1) (by Hard Spun o/o Charismatic mare) – Wicked Strong will be the sentimental favorite of this year’s Derby based on his name alone. (In lieu of long explanation, his owner’s first choice of name was Boston Strong). The Derby being a 20-horse race, there are always enough horses to ensure a fast early pace. This usually means a horse that runs faster later and is experienced at passing rivals has a very good chance of winning. Wicked Strong has the best resume of this style of runner, and his pedigree supports it. His sire Hard Spun ran 2nd in the best Derby field of the 21st century. His damsire Charismatic won the Derby, and his 2nd damsire was a world record holder for a distance longer than the Derby. I rate his fair odds at 6-1 but the sentimentality of Derby bettors may make him lower on May 3rd.

 Hoppertunity (PT Odds: 8-1) (by Any Given Saturday o/o Unaccounted For mare) – The Bob Baffert’s trainee was last seen running a few lengths behind California Chrome in the Santa Anita Derby. Hoppertunity won the Rebel Stakes at Oaklawn three weeks earlier, securing his spot in the Kentucky Derby lineup. It’s possible, even likely, that Baffert had Hopp geared down for the SA Derby with eyes on the bigger prize. He won the Rebel from off the pace, and his SA Derby 2nd came after passing horses. Hopp’s sire is Any Given Saturday and his sire is Distorted Humor, who sired Funny Cide and was the grandsire of I’ll Have Another; Hoppertunity is half-brother to top filly Executiveprivilege, sharing classic influence Danzig as a 2nd Damsire. Hopp did not race as a 2 year old, which makes him subject to the “Apollo curse”; thing is, Baffert has late-developing stars every year and his home track (Santa Anita) opens its winter meet a week before New Year’s. He aims to break the curse and Hoppertunity is his best chance since Bodemeister in 2012.

 Medal Count (PT Odds: 20-1) (by Dynaformer o/o Unbridled’s Song mare) – The main knock against Medal Count is that his best performances have thus far been on turf and Polytrack and not the dirt surface of Churchill Downs. It’s actually why I like this horse so much – he’s likely to be ignored as a turf/AW specialist. Still, this is a horse that won his first race on dirt and has trained primarily on the Churchill Downs main track. Medal Count is THE pedigree standout in this race. His sire Dynaformer was Barbaro’s sire and a tremendous distance influence besides. The Unbridled line influence is a huge indicator of Derby success, both through sire and dams, and last year’s winner Orb was out of an Unbridled mare. His third dam is by the greatest sire of the 20th century, Northern Dancer. If Medal Count can settle mid-pack, he’ll be positioned to get first run ahead of the closers.

 Tier 2 (Include with key horses in exactas/trifectas)

 Ride on Curlin (PT Odds: 12-1, b/c of Jockey Borel) (by Curlin o/o Storm Cat mare) – There are three things I like about this horse: he has improved every race, his pedigree suggests further improvement with age, and has shown ability to pass horses. Two things I don’t like: 1) He hasn’t actually won many races, which I actually think is important; and 2) He gets the jockey services of one Calvin Borel, three-time winner of the Kentucky Derby. While I think Borel gives him as good a chance for success as any jockey (but no better), the public really thinks he’s magic and will bet Ride on Curlin much below his true win odds. RoC has a great chance to inflate an exotics ticket

 Danza (PT Odds: 20-1) (by Street Boss o/o French Deputy mare) – I was surprised as anyone in attendance when this Arkansas Derby longshot won at 40-1. I’ve since gone back and watched the race and was quite impressed by the way he patiently tracked the leaders then quickly accelerated and continued to move. Todd Pletcher has been awfully quiet on this one, but he was only a nose behind two of the top 2-year-olds at Saratoga and has come back well this year. I have heard people questioning his pedigree, as his sire Street Boss was primarily a sprinter, but his damside has some more classic distance influence from French Deputy and Tanks Prospect. Plus, one thing I’ve noted about in the past about sires – sprinters sired by classic oriented sires often pass on both speed and class to their offspring. This seems to me doubly true of the Mr Prospector line; Distorted Humor, Speightstown, Elusive Quality, Midnight Lute to name a few all were sprinters/milers but have seen sons fare quite well in classic distance races. Street Boss’s sire Street Cry counts Derby winner Street Sense and all-time great mare Zenyatta among his progeny; I won’t let Danza surprise me again.

 Dance with Fate (PT Odds: 15-1) (by Two Step Salsa o/o Saint Ballado mare) – Similar to Medal Count, Dance with Fate is probably going to get pegged as a AW specialist following his Blue Grass win. He does have some dirt form (placing in Santa Anita’s Frontrunner Stakes), though his best attribute for the Derby is his late running style. I’m not sold on his pedigree, but Two Step Salsa comes from a branch of the Mr Prospector line considered more hardy than brilliant. His damsire Saint Ballado reinforces those attributes, and I expect Dance with Fate to contend late with a narrow shot at winning.

Tier 3 (3-4 spots in minimum bet trifectas, superfectas)

Chitu (PT Odds: 20-1) (by Henny Hughes o/o A.P. Indy mare) – Normally I would exclude this runner based on his sire Henny Hughes, a great grandson of Storm Cat (whose line has no Derby wins despite it’s prominence). I add Chitu for two reasons: 1) Female champion and future HOF distaffer Beholder also has HH as a sire and her staying ability really impressed me in two nine furlong performances. 2) Chitu has several distance influences on his damside including A.P. Indy and Zilzal as damsire and 2nd damsire, and his dam and 2nd dam were both distance runners on turf. Chitu will race near the front of the pack, which will lower his chances to win, but I could see him holding on at a price.

AE-Social Inclusion (PT Odds: 15-1) (by Pioneerof the Nile o/o Saint Ballado mare) – This horse has shown a lot of brilliance in his three lifetime starts but could only warrant a 3rd in the Wood Memorial. His first two wins at high speed figures means he’ll get play on Derby Day. His connections have been champing at the bit to run in the Derby and are only awaiting one or two more drops. Good pedigree for the distance with the Unbridled line crossed to Saint Ballado. Definitely a player

Commanding Curve (PT Odds: 30-1+) (by Master Command o/o Lion Hearted mare) – The other CC could be this year’s Golden Soul (2nd last year) having drawn in with recent defections. Another late runner who has shown improvement in every start, his biggest appeal will be the odds that he would contribute to any exotic bet featuring him. Sometimes you have to get lucky in the Derby for a big score, and he has the profile of one that could “blow up the tote”.

Candy Boy (PT Odds: 18-1) (by Candy Ride o/o In Excess mare) – It could be that 3rd place in California might be better than the rest of the US, but he did not prove better than Hoppertunity in the Santa Anita Derby, so I have a hard time putting him higher. Nine furlongs or less is probably his best distance, and it’s likely he also wasn’t fully cranked in the Santa Anita Derby. His trainer John Sadler is a good one and his jockey Gary Stevens has a few Derbies on his Hall of Fame resume. Prefer others.

General a Rod (PT Odds: 25-1) (by Roman Ruler o/o Dynaformer mare) – Third in the Florida Derby after a couple of seconds, this is another one who could threaten late. He has a decent pedigree for the longer distance, as Roman Ruler has sired a Belmont winner and Dynaformer has the aforementioned Derby and distance influence. I have heard his recent training has been solid if not spectacular and I’m not certain he’s top flight.

Tier 4 (Big budget players can include these on some tickets)

Uncle Sigh (PT Odds: 25-1) (by Indian Charlie o/o Pine Bluff mare) – Even though he’s been running behind others in New York, I think he has the style (near front, not the lead) and enough pedigree, especially beneath, to threaten at the top of the lane. Not one I see accelerating from there, though, but hanging on for a piece.

 Intense Holiday (PT Odds: 20-1) (by Harlan’s Holiday o/o Unbridled’s Song mare) – I really like this colt and hope he runs even enough here to take a shot at the Preakness, where I think this pedigree will be well-suited. No Storm Cat-line horse has won the Derby and I think that history is not likely to be broken here. This Pletcher trainee will have a good career, I expect, but not threaten for the Derby win.

AE-Pablo Del Monte (PT Odds: 40-1) by Giant’s Causeway o/o Bring the Heat mare) – Currently 21 in standings, will need to draw in. Was the only speed that held in the Bluegrasss Stakes, and that lists includes some higher profile horses. Giant’s Causeway is the best of the Storm Cat line for distance influence, but his progeny have not done much Derby Day.

Samraat (PT Odds: 12-1) (by Noble Causeway o/o Indian Charlie mare) – While this one’s only loss is to Wicked Strong while running 2nd in the Wood Memorial, I don’t think this one’s pedigree (Storm Cat line w few distance influences underneath) suggests going any further. I think he’ll take some significant play, however, and will go off as the day’s biggest underlay

Tapiture (PT Odds: 25-1) (by Tapit o/o Olympio mare) Think he has hit his distance limitations while running 4th in Hot Springs. Still, has shown some ability to handle adversity, but not enough to overcome a preference for a shorter distance.

Tier 5 (Only bet when the ticket says ALL)

Vinceremos (PT Odds: 35-1) (by Pioneerof the Nile o/o More than Ready mare) – Earned his way in with a 1st and 2nd in Tampa, but didn’t do much in the Blue Grass Stakes. His odds make him somewhat appealing but not sure that his wins over suspect competition have held up this year.

We Miss Artie (PT Odds: 25-1) (by Artie Schiller o/o Fusaichi Pegasus mare) – Now We Miss Artie actually does seem like a turf/AW specialist to me, but I’can’t deny that there’s potential for an upset from this one. Would compare to Animal Kingdom, also a Spiral Stakes winner, but this one does not have the great distance influence from the dam that AK had.

Vicar’s In Trouble (PT Odds: 15-1) (by Into Mischief o/o Vicar mare – The other Ken Ramsey entrant, with We Miss Artie. Hard tryer, good horse, needs the lead. Staggered home to win Louisiana Derby, will be way too short here.

Wildcat Red (PT Odds: 18-1) (by D’Wildcat o/o Miner’s Mark mare – A Storm Cat line sprint sire gives us Wildcat Red who has definitely been impressive in his wins and seconds. See this one being way too short on pedigree to be a factor for more than a mile.

Harry’s Holiday (PT Odds: 40-1) (by Harlan’s Holiday o/o Orientate mare – A Polytrack runner by a miler out of a sprinter. By all rights, should be the longest shot on the board, but the blessed public will give him a much better shot than he actually has.

Wagering Strategy

As always, I’ll be keeping my eye on the odds Derby Day for my final bets. Right now, I’m leaning towards win bets on Hoppertunity and Medal Count and potentially Danza (if he gets ignored in betting again). I suspect Medal Count will be my only Place and Show bets, if he goes off at 15+ odds. Mostly, I will try to hit exotics with California Chrome heavily weighted with my Tier 1 horses then longshots mixed in with my top 4 at the minimum bets. Good luck!

The Decade Double

Here’s a Daily Racing Form headline from 2024 (yes, the future):

North American Racing Handle Doubles Over the Last Decade

Do you find this headline completely unbelievable? It shouldn’t be. Let me ask this: how much would betting handle have to grow year-over-year for 10 years for that headline to be true? It’s not large – it’s only a 7.2% growth rate, compounded annually. In terms of growth above normal economic growth, it’s only a 3-4% adder to normal national growth trends.

Doubling handle would mean that contributions to track earnings and purses would also double during that period. (Neither earnings nor purses would double, since those are supported now by other sources like admission, concessions, and slots) I think most observers, seeing that handle was at an historic high, would no longer say that “horse racing is dead” but that racing was as good as it had been in 30-40 years.

Now, here’s two alternative beginnings to the article that accompany the headline. Which do you find more plausible?


1. Industry officials celebrated the 10th consecutive year of handle growth, noting that wagering on thoroughbred racing has doubled since the US marked the unofficial end of the Great Recession in 2014. Attendance and off-track wagering both doubled, track revenues increased 80%, and purse accounts increased by 60%. The purse account increase reflects that purse subsidies from other sources (racino/slots revenue, sales, supplemental fees) remained flat during this time. Tracks and horsemen used the windfall to increase races by 35% while the average purse went up 18%. Breeding finally reversed a two-decade long decline as the 2023 foal crop of 40,000 returned to levels not seen since 1991.

Most track officials credited their marketing and promotional efforts to get fans back to the track as the main source of success, but acknowledged that Jess’s Dream – the first foal of popular 2009 Horse of the Year Rachel Alexandra – winning the Triple Crown in 2015 kick-started their efforts. When “Taco” came back to race in 2016 and dueled in a cross-country campaign with the late-developing Cozmic One (Zenyatta’s first foal), the Breeders Cup Classic at Belmont Park featuring their final duel (won in a late nose by Cozmic One) set betting and ratings records for a non-Triple Crown race and energized the sport…


2. Industry officials acknowledged that the 2014 “Decade Double” initiative pioneered by The Jockey Club, NTRA, and a consortium of racetracks and other racing industry groups has met their goal of doubling betting handle on North American races in 10 years. The Decade Double initiative began with the premise that the $23 billion target for wagering on throughbreds would represent an all-time, inflation-adjusted, high indicator of interest in the sport. The leaders of the “Decade Double” campaign credit its focus on customers and getting buy-in from tracks and horsemen on how to share gains.

” We knew that the sport couldn’t grow without customer support,” said Jeff Gural, Jockey Club board member and head of the Decade Double Initiative. “Significant gains had to be realized by the customer – the bettor – and ultimately that meant lowering the price of betting on racing.”

“Working with our horsemen and tracks, we concluded – and believe me, it was a tense fight at times –  that bettors needed to see the lion’s share of gains, with tracks and horsemen splitting the rest. We settled on a 40/30/30 split, and that’s when efforts to reduce takeout by 40% began.”

This year, the average on-track takeout for a Win bet was 10%, which horseplayer’s Decade Double representative Andy Asaro noted was “much nearer betting the LA Jaguars and the points in the Super Bowl.” Exotics averaged 12-14%; in 2014, however, the typical takeout on exacta or trifecta pools was 20-25%.

The Decade Double and industry groups like NYRA and the CHRB aggressively promoted the takeout decreases, at first in hopes to keep track revenues and purse accounts level. Most groups acknowledge that the success was unexpected: track revenues have increased by 48% and total purses by 36%, despite the lower takeout. Racing days and total races have remained flat in response to a lower profile DD initiative meant to prop up field size in response to low foal crops. Even those have since recovered to a “healthy level” of 35,000, what many breeders consider sustainable at this level of betting…


It truly is amazing how growth can positively impact everyone while stagnation leads to tribalism and in-fighting and decision-making based on the fear of loss as opposed to the hope of gain. That’s unfortunately where horse racing is today.

Article 2, even if the numbers aren’t exact, shows that broad-based gains are possible if they accompany a plan and a target for growth. If we collectively bet $20B on racing, no one could rightly claim that racing was dead. It is, however, hard to envision that future if customers do not share in those gains. And again, the numbers are not daunting:

  • To double in volume, handle needs to increase by 7.2% a year.
  • To decrease takeout by 40% over 10 years, takeout needs to decrease by 5% a year.

The key, of course, is to offset the short-term revenue decrease from pricing with 2 other Ps of marketing.

  • Promote the heck out of the sport emphasizing lower prices (and other promotions)
  • Product quality needs to stay high /  improve (larger fields, showcase racing days, etc.)

The time element is the hardest part, because it’s not an overnight fix. Nothing worth doing ever is.

The Reality of Fantasy Horse Racing

Fantasy sports have been an enormously successful means of increasing fan engagement for the Big 3 professional sports organizations in the US: the NFL, the NBA and MLB. Fantasy baseball started the trend with the popularity of “Rotisserie” baseball, which has been around since 1980 (with a few predecessors), and I can remember playing a modified version as early as 1992 (I was 14). Fantasy football was the game that exploded the phenomenon, as its 4-month season with a weekly cadence, book-ended by a draft and playoffs, expanded its audience, being less time-intensive than its baseball counterpart.

Several racing industry organizations (the NTRA, Churchill Downs, the Breeders Cup, WinStar Farms, among others) have all launched and promoted “fantasy racing” games with the intention of attracting a new audience to the sport. I am not going out on a limb by saying that all these efforts that have thus far mostly failed to garner significant engagement from existing fans and have utterly failed in bringing fans of other fantasy sports to fantasy racing. This post’s title buries the lede – the reality of fantasy horse racing is that it sucks.

Successful fantasy sports games put the player in place of the owner.

For the most part, fantasy racing games fail because they replicate some other element of the sport, usually the handicapping and betting aspect. The current fantasy racing game being promoted is the Breeders Cup Fantasy Challenge; if you follow the link, you’ll see that the BC challenge is basically a weeks-long handicapping contest that is free to enter. It utilizes a few successful elements of fantasy football – weeks-long competition, free to enter, form up leagues – but the basic premise remains “pick a winner”.

The Churchill Down Road to the Roses contest tries to replicate the ownership experience somewhat by picking a stable of Derby contenders then earning points for their placing in Derby preps. The contest, however, almost infamously, spectacularly failed when one entrant picked Verrazano for all 6 spots in his stable, having an easy lead going into the Derby. Orb’s win prevented any major egg on CDI’s face, but still…

Successful fantasy sports games put the player in place of the owner by recreating situations that owners face.

In my estimation, good fantasy sports games do three things well: create scarcity, create differential value, and create interactions between players. These are all constraints faced by, say, an NFL owner. Bud Adams (a Nashville resident, I’m a Titans’ fan) can only employ 53 players, pay them a total of $123M, and can’t try to offer a player under contract with another team more money to play for him. A good QB is worth more than a good kicker, and The Blind Side taught us the value of left tackles. Still, players can be released, picked up, and traded and NFL general managers are constantly on the phones with their colleagues as they assemble their team.

Successful fantasy games create scarcity

In fantasy football, a player can play for only one team. A team can only have so many roster spots. A team can only start 1 or 2 players at each position.

I’m unaware of any fantasy racing game that actually prevents someone from picking a horse if it’s already been picked. It’s not really ownership if multiple people can “own” the same horse for purposes of a game.

Successful fantasy games create differential value

In most fantasy sports, differential value is created via draft – the players that are drafted earlier have greater value than those drafted later. In a draft format, luck has a big role – if there are, say, three clear-cut top picks, whoever gets the top 3 draft slots has a huge advantage. The innovation in response to that is the auction draft, where each team has a fixed pool of funds out of which to bid on players. Draft order doesn’t matter – if you want the top pick, you’ll pay for him but at the expense of filling out the rest of your roster.

Again, most fantasy racing games make little attempt to make one horse more “expensive” to own than another, largely because there is no scarcity in the first place

Successful fantasy games create interactions between players

The absolute best parts of fantasy football are, in order: the draft, the mid-week deals, the trash talk. Trying to improve your team is the essential element of the game, trying to win by acting as your own GM. A typical deal in FF might be a top wide-receiver and back-up running back for a top running back – the success or failure of a trade depends on the difference in opinion of value.

Have you ever traded/bought/sold/claimed a horse in a fantasy league? I think not.

Fantasy racing games simply do not capture the essential elements that make other fantasy sports compelling and fun. This is because they do not attempt to replicate, in any serious manner, the experience of owning and managing a racing stable. But here’s the great thing:

They could.

2013 Kentucky Derby – Handicapping the Field

The 2013 Kentucky Derby is, in many ways, the polar opposite of last year’s. In 2012, 9 horses that had run in the Breeders Cup Juvenile 6 months prior would line up to Run for the Roses. To many (including me), this indicated a good group of three-year-old colts. If you were counted among this group, or beat a member head-to-head, you proved your place among the line-up in Louisville.

That sentiment indicated to me that the winners of the Santa Anita Derby and the Arkansas Derby, among others, were good bets in the Kentucky Derby. I’ll Have Another and Bodemeister didn’t run in the BC Juvenile but they beat, respectively, its 3rd place finisher and the BC Juvenile Sprint champ. They were fast horses, and a bit of pedigree work indicated to me that they were two of the three best bets to win on Derby day. Turns out, last year, I got lucky – the race shaped as well as I could imagine and my prediction paid $300 on a $2 exacta bet.

This year…well, this year is a mess. Exactly zero horses have stuck around from the BC Juvenile to contest the Kentucky Derby. Not that the BC Juvenile was ever a major predictor of Derby Success, but it has been legitimately difficult to identify the competition against which this year’s prep winners have won.

The Derby points system has added a twist – by marginalizing two-year-old races, the points system has brought more stamina-laden pedigrees to the forefront. (Actually, it has done the converse, minimizing the impact of speedy, precocious horses winning rich juvenile purses towards Derby qualification). This year, much more than last, I find it much more difficult to disqualify a large group of horses on pedigree alone.

Which leaves me to actual handicapping which, by the looks of my ADW account, should not be trusted by anyone reading this article. I may only commend myself by saying that I have cared about these 20 horses much more than the hundreds that I have glanced over on my forms. With that, my thoughts.

As last year, I’m going to group the Kentucky Derby entrants into 4 tiers. The 1st group, I consider the prime win contenders. The second, I think can win but will not bet to do so – instead, I’ll put them in most of my exotic bets. Tier 3, I’ll add to the bottom of a few exactas and trifectas, mostly looking for prices. Tier 4, if they win or finish in the money, I close my laptop a loser – in a race of 20, it’s a not unlikely outcome. I’m providing what I think will be the horse’s post-time odds.

Tier 1 (Top Win Contenders):

Itsmyluckyday – 15-1 – What’s to like about the 2nd place finisher in the Florida Derby? In two January races, he was absolutely the fastest 3yo colt on the Derby Trail. In the G3 Holy Bull, he easily beat BC Juvenile winner Shanghai Bobby, who is a very fast horse (and I expect will be again in future 1-turn races). Then, he got some time off. He came back and finished 2nd in the Florida Derby to the likely Derby favorite, Orb. I think the time off was a reset button for IMLD – the FL Derby was his first effort off a layoff and horses often (usually?) perform better in their 2nd race back. Trainer Eddie Plesa has said the Derby was the target all along – I believe him.

I couldn’t get on board with IMLD if I didn’t think he had the pedigree to get 10f, at least faster than the other contenders. His sire, Lawyer Ron, had great success in 9f races and his lesser success at 10f is largely because of great winners like Barbaro, Invasor, and Curlin. He’s from the Danzig line of Northern Dancer, which has one Derby winner in Big Brown (thru Danzig’s son Boundary). His dam is a granddaughter of Seattle Slew (by Doneraile Court), his 2nd dam a grand-daughter of Mr Prospector (by Crafty Prospector), and his 3rd dam a daughter of Secretariat.

Watching his races, Itsmyluckyday runs with his head down, which may not seem spectacular, but turns out to be a very efficient way of running. This should help him in a race with 19 other horses. Speed, planning, pedigree, efficiency – this sounds likes a winning combination, and he should be in the 12- to 15-1 range come Derby day.

Revolutionary – 8-1 – Even before the announcement that 3-time Derby winner Calvin Borel was going to ride, I thought Revolutionary had the makings of a Kentucky Derby winning horse. I consider his distance pedigree to bet tops among Derby contenders. Certainly, his sire War Pass was a brilliant 2yo who flamed out as he stretched out, but the Blushing Groom line to generally considered to contribute stamina to its runners. In fact, just 6 runners in the line have made the Derby starting gate since 2000. Three, however, have finished in the money and Animal Kingdom (by champion miler Leroidesanimaux), won the 2011 Derby. Revolutionary’s damside is most impressive; his damsire is AP Indy (stamina influence) and his 2nd dam, Up the Flagpole, is the 2nd dam to BCC Classic winner and 2003 Horse of the Year Mineshaft. This horse is bred to go long, and I like his determination in the stretch

In my opinion, having Borel up for a horse owned by Winstar Farms and trained by Todd Pletcher (the exact combination for Super Saver winning in 2010) serves only to depress Revolutionary’s odds. The buzz on other horses (the next two specifically) will prevent Revolutionary from being too underlaid in the win pool, and in most exotic bets he’ll contribute a fair multiplier.

Orb – 5-1 – This horse has completely grown on me. Normally, I would downgrade an AP Indy or a Storm Cat-line colt because they have performed so poorly in the Derby, despite multiple starters. But Orb…Orb has made me a believer that, not only can he win, but that he may be a very special horse indeed. A homebred by the Phipps family, Orb is by Spendthrift Farm’s Malibu Moon, who I believe to be both the most versatile and underrated son of AP Indy at stud. (Malibu Moon is also one of the only horses I’ve “met”, on a private walking tour of Spendthrift. You are warned I may be biased.) Orb is inbred to Mr Prospector, his dam a daughter of Unbridled, the last horse to both win the Kentucky Derby and sire a Derby-winner. Damascus and Bold Ruler both sired members of his female family, the latter in a pairing with the dam of the great(est) filly Ruffian.

Those who speak of trainer Shug McCaughey do so with reverence and awe and Orb is his best shot ever to win. On his best, he has beaten one of the best in Itsmyluckyday. Jockey Joel Rosario has been winning everything this past month and will certainly give the horse a great shot. Orb won’t be a great price as the likely favorite but a victory by him would be a victory for the sport, and some of the best people in it. Personally, I’d like to put the AP handicapping angle to bed, and Orb is the best bet to do it.

Tier 1a – (Strong Win Contenders):

Verrazano – 5-1 – The horse that seemed a sure fire favorite does seem to be getting overlooked a bit, and probably by me as well. He’s an undefeated 4-for-4 with his first start on January 1st of this year. He beat the winner of the Blue Grass Stakes, Java’s War, in the Tampa Bay Derby and several graded winners in the Wood Memorial. He has a fairly strong pedigree for the distance: the Turn-To line (of which sire More than Ready) is part is respectable as a stamina influence and Verrazano is suspended on his dam side by such names as Giant’s Causeway, Mr Prospector, Blushing Groom and Dr Fager. He seems nearer to the type of horse that Todd Pletcher is famous for training (brilliant early, fragile late) but it’s quite possible we haven’t yet seen what this horse is capable of.

Connections and top jockey John Velzaquez mean this horse cannot be ignored, but I do think he is underlaid at any price below 10-1. Still, I cannot ignore that he consistently wins and he is very fast. I often remind myself that all horses can “get the distance” but it takes special ones to do it quickly. I’m not particularly excited about Verrazano, but I have to respect him, and may need him on the top of a few exotics in order to cash.

Java’s War – 12-1 – Java’s War was my sneaky longshot horse until he went and ruined that by winning the Blue Grass. At least he showed his capability that day, and like the other son of War Pass in here (Revolutionary), I think he’ll have no problem with the distance. Java’s War may have an even better pure stamina pedigree being in-bred to Blushing Groom top and bottom (by a BG-line sire out of a BG-line mare). Others have described him as having a more “grassy” pedigree and I cannot dispute that – he has won on all three surfaces. There’s no doubt in my mind he can make a winning run if he can get into contention by the 3/8ths pole. Jockey Julien Leparoux will need to do a nice piloting job to avoid a number of horses backing up while not going too wide.

I’ve already committed to parlaying my $5 win ticket on Java’s War in the Blue Grass to a $29 worth of win and exacta tickets with him on top, so I’m hoping for 12- to 15-1. Probably will get it, but he won’t be supercharging any exotic tickets like he might have at 30-1.

Tier 2 – Top Exotic Plays:

Palace Malice – 15-1 – This horse has already run 3 times in 8 weeks and is the biggest enigma of Pletcher’s contenders. He finished a good 3rd in a weird Risen Star, then a bad trip 4th in the Louisiana Derby in which he looked the equal (or better) to stablemate Revolutionary. But, he wheeled back to get a good 2nd to Java’s War in the Blue Grass in which he did most of the hard work stalking the leaders to just miss to the fast closer. By 2007 HOY Curlin, winner of multiple classic races and grandson of Mr. Prospector, his distaff side includes several distance influences that are more associated with turf success. He does, however, have one overlooked angle: this year’s Derby is run on May 4th, Star Wars Day (May the Fourth be with you) and he’s the only runner to have 1986 BC Classic winner Skywalker as a sire of direct female relative. I have invented worse reasons to bet a horse and I’d love to see Curlin have a live one.

Will Take Charge & Oxbow – 20-1 – I put these two D. Wayne Lukas trainees together as I think they have equal shots for different reasons. Will Take Charge has two stakes wins this year, the latter in the Rebel Stakes being what I thought was Oaklawn’s best field. That the connections skipped the Arkansas Derby or Blue Grass is strange, but it sounds like he might have had a growth spurt and has looked good in training. He likes to travel in mid-pack and knows how to pass horses. He is in the Unbridled line from Mr Prospector which has been very successful in the Derby, and his distaff side boasts notable distance influences Rubiano, Blushing Groom and Swaps. His dam is multiple G1 winner Take Charge Lady. Big shot.

Oxbow, on the other hand. seemed to peak early on the Derby trail, winning in January, placing in February in March then coming off the board in April. Looks like he’s going the wrong way. A couple things to note: in all but the win, he drew the outside post. He has had a different jockey in every race this year – (his winning jock is on his stablemate, but gets newly unretired Hall of Famer Gary Stevens as a consolation prize. Not bad.) He is likely to be forwardly placed in a moderately paced race – his preferred runstyle. His pedigree is virtually identical to last year’s Belmont Stakes 2nd place finisher Paynter. Their sire Awesome Again is one of the best influences for success at the 10f distance; however, most of those wins have come in older horses. A horse like Oxbow you need a price on and you’re likely to get it.

Frac Daddy – 50-1 – My first big reach, but bear with me. I don’t consider this horse a major win contender based on pedigree (sire Scat Daddy being of the Storm Cat line) but I acknowledge he checks a lot of other boxes. He’s had success at Churchill, breaking his maiden here, and finishing 2nd in the Kentucky Jockey Club stakes at 2. His 1st race back, he tore off half his foot (horses do this, apparently) and still finished the Holy Bull (albeit well back of Itsmyluckyday). His next start, he roped Orb and IMLD in the Florida Derby. His trainer (Kenny McPeek of Java’s War) had enough faith in him to ship to Arkansas where he finished a close 2nd to Overanalyze. Frac Daddy is a big horse with a large stride who is looking at a peak effort at a big price – he may not hit the exacta, but is a horse I’ll feature in multiple trifectas and superfectas to get one of those legendary Derby payoffs. I think you’d get at least 12-1 on a show bet with him, if that’s your thing.

Vyjack – 15-1 – I have bumped this horse up from a low tier 3 horse to my lowest tier 2 horse because I think he’s got some guts. Other handicappers I respect are very high on him based on his pre-Wood Memorial form. He apparently had an illness the week preceding the Wood, didn’t run his best, but still got 3rd. His illness has been treated and should be able to give good effort. I’m not high on his pedigree (by Into Mischief, of the Storm Cat line) but he may be positioned well enough to sustain a run that gets him in the money. As a gelding, Vyjack may well be a horse that makes noise in the handicap division for years, but don’t think today’s his day. Respect nonetheless.

Tier 3 – Reluctant Exotic Plays:

Goldencents – 8-1 – He is underlay #1, primarily because of the combination of trainer (last year’s winning trainer Doug O’Neil) and part-owner Coach Rick Pitino (of the national champion Louisville Cardinals). The national story should translate into some local love and some dumb money on a horse that hasn’t seen any horses like those above. That’s actually unfair, however, as Goldencents does have a few things in his favor. For one, he’s fast, and he ran an excellent Santa Anita Derby against the best that the West Coast had to offer (which was much worse that last year’s contingent). He did so employing a different running style than this previous wins (off the pace instead of front running), which shows some versatility. He had considerable success at 2, seems sound enough, and Doug O’neil demonstrated last year that he knows how to prepare a horse for the Derby. I cannot get past Goldencents’ pedigree which, like Vyjack, has Into Mischief on the top and not much else on the bottom. Think running near the front gives him his best chance to hang on for a piece, an outcome I can neither rule out nor endorse for the low price I’ll get for betting it.

Overanalyze – 15-1 – I don’t love Overanalyze but the Arkansas Derby winner should always be considered a threat. Still, this year’s renewal seemed a cut below, especially with Oxbow and Bob Baffert’s contingent laying an egg, and a slow final time. Pedigree is fair on top (by Dixie Union, sire of last year’s Belmont winner Union Rags) but doesn’t have much on the bottom. Hard to recommend at the price, but he is a grade 1 winner that may be sitting on his best race. Will consider for Uncle Mo’s former connections.

Black Onyx – 25-1 – The Spiral Stakes winner hopes to take the same path that Animal Kingdom did to victory in 2011, but I cannot say he’s as good a fit on top as that one was. Still, Went the Day Well hit the superfecta last year and Black Onyx has pedigree enough to be a factor. Having shipped to Churchill Downs right after his win, he’ll have a familiarity with the surface, though works do not seem to point to him like they did to Animal Kingdom. Again, price is important, and you’ll get it.

Mylute – 15-1 – The second major underlay candidate, since female jockey Rosie Napravnik will be riding him. Now, I firmly believe that Rosie gives Mylute his absolute best chance to win, but doesn’t turn a 40-1 horse into a 15-1 shot. Still, in this guy’s favor, he is one of a handful of the Mr Prospector line runners in here and looks to be running late. He gave Revolutionary all he could handle last out, but think the situation favored him that day. Good story, may move up on wet track; tough for me to endorse.

Lines of Battle – 25-1 – UAE Derby winner with a pretty terrific pedigree for the distance. I have a hard time supporting a horse, however, whose connections ship him half way around the world four days before this race on a less than favored surface. Pedigree play, because War Front up top, Arch below can win a 10f race (though that race is usually on grass). No jockey has yet been named

Tier 4 – (They finish in the money, I lose):

Normandy Invasion – 8-1 – Underlay #3. Eventually, we all have to take stands against perceived good horses and Normandy Invasion is my stand against this year. His late charging 2nd in the Wood Memorial has everyone holding him up as the “wiseguy” horse, thinking his late kick will mean a victory with another furlong to run. I have doubts that his pedigree will allow him to get the distance. His sire, Tapit, has been remarkably productive getting stakes winners at 2 and 3, but that success appears to top out at 8.5 furlongs. His distaff side appears speed oriented as well. His Wood Memorial placing may ultimately have been a product of Vyjack being sick and the rest being simply outclassed. He’s going to take a lot of action, just not mine.

Golden Soul –  50-1 – Charles Fipke owns both Golden Soul and Java’s War, but this is the lesser of the two entries. This runner has a pretty solid pedigree that looks best suited to grass, but should get the distance comfortably, if slowly. He’s by Perfect Soul, a son of all-time great sire Sadler’s Wells, and out of a Mr Prospector mare. I honestly think this horse will beat half the field on pedigree alone, but lack of speed will prevent him from threatening the top contenders.

Charming Kitten – 40-1 –  Popular owners Ken and Sarah Ramsey send out Charming Kitten and, like Golden Soul, he threatens a mid-pack finish. Sire Kitten’s Joy is also from the Sadler’s Wells line but his progeny also do their best running on grass and artificial surfaces. This is Todd Pletcher’s lowest rated entrant and I get the feeling that the Ramseys are just happy to have a shot. They cleaned up over at Keeneland, so they’ll have no problem affording tickets for their friends and family to pack the winner’s circle, or the bar at the Mansion.

Falling Sky – 50-1 – Poor Falling Sky – I’ve never given this grade 3 winner enough credit. He won the Sam Davis, then finished 3rd to Verrazano and Java’s War in the Tampa Bay Derby. He got more points for a 4th in the Arkansas Derby. His sire, Lion Heart, is a solid performer if not a stamina contributor. His dam sire, Sea Hero, won the Derby and there’s some distance influence beneath that. He just seems a horse that’s going backwards and unlikely to move forward on Derby day.

Giant Finish50-1 – Clearly a case of the owner wanting a horse in the Derby, as he was pointed toward an allowance race at Belmont before it was clear he’d be the 20th in. He is 2 for 3 on New York dirt, but he’s up against it here. Be thankful for horses like these, however – they improve the odds on everyone else.

AE – Fear the Kitten – 50-1 – Another Kitten’s Joy with a couple placings on dirt to get in. His best race, in Oaklawn’s Southwest, came in the mud. A lot to like from his damside, with Dynaformer, In Reality, and Arts and Letters contributing. The fact that he underperformed on Polytrack may indicate he is more suited to dirt and could be a surprise at a big price. A lot has to fall apart for that to happen, however.

2013 Kentucky Derby Trail – Historical Pedigree Statistics

I had an interesting exchange last week following Pool 1 of the Kentucky Derby Future Wager, where I supported Code West in the pool over a very good horse who had just beaten him, Super Ninety-Nine (running today in Oaklawn’s Southwest Stakes).

@mikedorr77 @ejxd2 you are tough on pedigree. Pulpit out of Unbridled’s Song mare isn’t hopeless at 1 1/4. Staying together bigger concern.

— jeremyclemons (@jeremyclemons) February 11, 2013

Jeremy is right, when it comes to the Kentucky Derby, I am tough on pedigree. Last year, my inaugural post on pedigrees and the Kentucky Derby highlighted this odd fact; neither the two premier U.S. stallions of the last 25 years, Storm Cat and A.P. Indy, nor their siring progeny have produced a Derby winner. I made the contention that certain horses were bad bets in Kentucky Derby wagers because of that fact, that the entries representing those lines were underlaid as a result. I regret not having a more rigorous analysis to back that contention up, but good historical racing data is either expensive or laborious to obtain.

Twitter has been a bottomless source of handicapping insight and enthusiasm for the sport, and recently it provided a contact that has a passion for data and, I assume, a little free time to fulfill this request:

I appreciate Alex Campbell of Ontario Thoroughbred for coming through with a great data set with 331 entrants. I traced back each entrant to 8 distinct common ancestors or an “other”. Since 1997, for example, 87 descendants of the exemplary stallion Northern Dancer have entered the starting gate, but a full 32 of them are through his grandson Storm Cat. Similarly, Bold Ruler (who dominated Derby Pedigrees from before Secretariat to after Spectacular Bid) has had 44 representative runners since 1997, but all but 9 of them are by great-grandson A.P. Indy.

The sire that appears most often on top of Derby pedigrees is Mr Prospector, from the same foal crop (3 y.o. of 1973) as Secretariat and Forego. It may not seem fair comparing an older sire (first crop in 1976) to more recent ones (Storm Cat, 1989; A.P. Indy, 1997) but Mr. P’s Derby starters come through multiple sons, most notably Fappiano, through whom are a full third of the Mr P line representatives. Breaking out the Fappiano line seemed like a natural extension for the analysis.

Having identified common ancestry, I grouped by sire all Derby runners since 1997 (the first eligible crop for A.P. Indy). I calculated average finish, % of runners and handle wagered, and the ROI for a $2 bet on all entrants. The results are fascinating, confirming some suspicions but providing new insights as well.

Sire Lines with 20+ Derby Runners Since 1997

Sire Line

Runners

% Runners

% Pools

Pool / Rnrs

$2 ROI

Wins

Top 3

Exp. Top 3

Avg Finish

A.P. Indy

35

11.9%

13.6%

1.14

-2.00

0

4

7

10.7

Storm Cat

32

10.9%

8.8%

0.81

-2.00

0

5

4

10.5

Fappiano

30

10.2%

11.2%

1.09

2.20

2

8

5

8.4

Northern Dancer

45

15.4%

14.5%

0.95

-0.32

2

6

7

10.4

Mr. Prospector

65

22.2%

23.8%

1.07

0.21

6

11

11

9.1

Turn-To

22

7.5%

6.8%

0.90

-1.26

1

3

3

9.2

All Other

64

21.8%

21.2%

0.97

0.81

5

11

10

9.9

Total

293.0

-0.15

16

48.0

9.2

For A.P. Indy, the chart above says this – the AP Indy sire line has had 35 Derby entrants since 1997, which is 12% of total runners. 14% of all win dollars wagered were on APs, which is 14% more than the average runner. The line has no wins (so an ROI of -2.00) and 4 top 3s, but based on win pool dollars, we would have expected 7. AP Indy line runners have an average finish of 10.7, which is 1.5 positions behind the average finish position of 9.2

In summary, A.P.  Indy and his sons have accounted for 12% of Derby runners; those have been overbet, have not won, and have underperformed relative to expectations. I cannot say why, as the AP Indy line is known for a good balance of speed, stamina and brilliance. The line’s runners have performed well in the other two legs of the Triple Crown. I think it a genuine mystery in handicapping the race.

Storm Cat descendants are a bit more surprising. They have the same goose egg in the win column, but have five top 3s, one more than expected.  The line’s runners are generally underbet to expectations, by nearly 20%, and are not quite the money-burners I have accused them of being (just don’t bet them to win). I may only speculate, but the precocity of the Storm Cat line (and subsequent wins in 2-year-old graded stakes, often sprints/miles) have helped many make it to the Derby. Their mid-spring form, however, has been eclipsed by others and bettors have fully factored that in to their chances. It may turn out that the new Derby points system disadvantages these runners more than others.

Mr. Prospector (including Fappiano) is clearly a major influence – 32% of runners, half (8) of the winners, and 40% of in-the-money finishes. The Fappiano line (that includes sires Unbridled, Quiet American, Birdstone, Candy Ride and Empire Maker, among many others) stands out with two wins (Real Quiet and Mine that Bird) but another six in the money finishes (including Bodemeister and Dullahan last year). It’s the only major sub-line of Mr. Prospector line that is somewhat heavily bet (about 10% more than average) but has a positive ROI if betting all runners. (A word of warning, however – the ROI on the Fappiano line includes the $103 mutuel for Mine that Bird).

The non-Storm Cat Northern Dancer line (that includes the sub lines of notable sires Sadler’s Wells, Danzig, and Vice Regent, among others) is about average, underperforming average finish but meeting expectations for wins (Charismatic and Big Brown) and top 3s. The Turn-To line includes modern sires Arch, Dynaformer, and More than Ready) has similarly average performance (Barbaro the one winner) but is slightly underlaid at the windows.

The “All Other” column shows that it pays to look for a unique Derby pedigree. 5 winners of the last 16 years do not fit in the major common ancestors though  Maria’s Mon (sire of winners Monarchos and Super Saver) does trace back to Mr. Prospector’s sire Raise a Native. 2011 winner Animal Kingdom traces back to Blushing Groom, who shows up in only 6 Derby-running pedigrees. Those 6 runners produced three top 3s and average finish of 6.5 however  – small sample bias, but definitely worth looking at.

Below are results for multiple modern sire lines and their corresponding stats.

Modern Sire Line

Runners

% Runners

% Pool

Pool / Rnrs

$2 ROI

Wins

Top 3

Exp Top 3

Avg Finish

A.P. Indy

35

11.9%

13.6%

1.14

-2.00

0

4

7

10.7

Bold Ruler

9

3.1%

2.6%

0.83

-2.00

0

0

1

11.4

Fappiano

30

10.2%

11.2%

1.09

2.20

2

8

5

8.4

Forty Niner

12

4.1%

3.0%

0.74

3.35

2

3

1

10.3

Gone West

9

3.1%

3.1%

1.02

-0.64

1

2

2

9.3

Other Mr P

44

15.0%

17.6%

1.17

-0.47

3

6

8

8.8

Storm Cat

32

10.9%

8.8%

0.81

-2.00

0

5

4

10.5

Danzig

12

4.1%

6.6%

1.62

-1.27

1

3

3

9.0

Deputy Minister

12

4.1%

2.7%

0.65

-2.00

0

1

1

11.1

Sadler’s Wells

8

2.7%

2.1%

0.78

-2.00

0

1

1

11.0

Other ND

13

4.4%

3.1%

0.70

3.12

1

1

1

10.8

Turn-To

22

7.5%

6.8%

0.90

-1.26

1

3

3

9.2

In Reality

10

3.4%

3.0%

0.87

-2.00

0

1

1

11.5

Blushing Groom

6

2.0%

2.1%

1.01

5.63

1

3

1

6.5

Caro

5

1.7%

2.3%

1.33

-2.00

0

1

1

11.4

Other

34

11.6%

11.3%

0.98

2.75

4

6

5

9.4

293.0

Years

16

48

9.2

Prominent sires with 3 y.o.s this Derby season, representing the current line:

AP Indy: himself, Pulpit, Mineshaft, Bernardini, Tapit, Sky Mesa, Malibu Moon, Majestic Warrior (many others)
Bold Ruler: Vindication, Slew City Slew, Leestown, Doneraile Court
Fappiano: Unbridled’s Song, Birdstone, Empire Maker, Even the Score, Broken Vow, Midnight Lute, Quiet American, Victory Gallop, Candy Ride
Forty Niner: Distorted Humor, Flower Alley, Sharp Humor, Any Given Saturday, Peace Rules, Trippi, Utopia
Gone West: Speightstown, Grand Slam, Elusive Quality, Smarty Jones, Proud Citizen, Mr Greeley, Istan
Other Mr Prospector: Smart Strike, Street Cry, Fusaichi Pegasus, Curlin, English Channel, Street Sense, Lemon Drop Kid, Henrythenavigator, Student Council (many others), E Dubai
Storm Cat: Giant’s Causeway, Tale of the Cat, Forestry, Harlan’s Holiday, Into Mischief, Johannesburg, Henny Hughes, Stormy Atlantic, Lion Heart (MANY others)
Danzig: Hard Spun, Big Brown, Magna Graduate, War Chant, War Front, Green Desert, Dylan Thomas
Deputy Minister: Awesome Again, Ghostzapper, Dehere, Wilko, Awesome of Course, Toccet, Touch Gold, Spring at Last, Silver Deputy, Badge of Silver
Sadler’s Wells: El Prado, Medaglia D’oro, Galileo, Perfect Soul, Kitten’s Joy, Horse Chestnut
Other Northern Dancer: Dixie Union, High Cotton, Hook and Ladder
Turn-To: Arch, More than Ready, Dynaformer, Sunriver, Rock Hard Ten, Hat Trick
In Reality: Tiznow, Tizwonderful, Officer, Successful Appeal
Blushing Groom: Leroidesanimaux, Yonaguska, War Pass, Zanjero, Kafwain, Congaree
Caro: Indian Charlie
Other: Holy Bull, Macho Uno, Monarchos, Giacomo, Pleasant Tap (numerous others)

Belmont Stakes 2012 Preview – Rooting vs Betting

Edit 12:05 PM EDT 6/8/12: Well, shoot…

Rooting for History and I’ll Have Another

I have to admit I’m nervous about this upcoming Belmont. I have been a racing fan for a few years now (2005) but have  really  embraced the sport (and its issues) in the last two or three years. (Amazing what an ADW account can accomplish on that front.) This year I wanted to take it up another level, deepen my study of handicapping (starting with the role of pedigree in Kentucky Derby winners), and sharing my insights with the community with this site.

I’ll Have Another was my Derby horse the moment he and Creative Cause (in step) passed Blueskiesandrainbows in the Santa Anita Derby. Win or lose, he’d have the money to go to Louisville as (I felt) a great fit for top honors at a price in the Derby. I’ll Have Another was my first Derby winner as a true fan; he’ll always symbolize to me what’s possible in this great sport.

Personally, I also think he is the horse most likely to win the Belmont on Saturday. I think he has the best classic and distance pedigree, he fits on speed and class, the pace set-up won’t be uncommon, and I think Doug O’Neil has done an excellent “old-school” job training him to this point. I will be cheering for him with every ounce of passion I can muster, but I’ll be a ball of nerves that entire day.

Betting for Profit and a Bigger Score

I may only bet the $2 souvenir ticket to win on him, however. Ed DeRosa of Twinspires.com noted on Twitter that Smarty Jones in 2004 would have paid better to place than to win, because of all the souvenir tickets that were placed in the win pool and never cashed. IHA may get the same treatment Saturday; if I make a big straight play on him, I’ll probably bet him to place, which may result in a similar (or better) payout as the win pool. That’s value when you believe in a horse like I do with I’ll Have Another.

I want to bet a different opinion entirely. Union Rags was sent off the 2nd choice in the Derby and finished a troubled sixth. Given his popularity pre-Derby, he will likely be the 2nd or 3rd choice in the Belmont depending on how the public rates him vs Dullahan. I do not believe Union Rags has the pedigree to win the Belmont. I think a lot of excuses (post, jockey, traffic) were made for his performance in the Derby. Personally, I believe Union Rags can be a spectacular miler, which is what his pedigree points to. He may contest the Belmont to the quarter pole, but likely no further.

I think he has a fantastic chance to finish off the board and even out of the superfecta, which should improve the value in exotics pools, as I expect UR to be on many a ticket. As for who I like, I go back to my pre-Derby thinking that this a formful, consistent crop of three-year olds where recent performance and pedigree are meaningful indicators of success. Getting a price will be the most difficult challenge of the weekend, so I’ll be putting most of my money into tris and supers of my top selections.

Based on class and connections and training reports, I expect Dullahan to run a big race.  His Derby 3rd was earned tracking (nut not gaining on) IHA for most of the stretch run. His half brother Mine that Bird ran 3rd in his Belmont, and I think Dullahan is a better runner. Next to IHA, I’ll have Dullahan on the most trifectas and superfectas.

Bob Baffert’s Paynter is the horse I believe has the best chance to upset I’ll Have Another for win honors. He finished 4th behind IHA in the Santa Anita Derby and has run two good efforts since, his last posting the 2nd best speed figure in the Belmont. His sire, Awesome Again, is a BC Classic winner and has sired some of the best runners in the last decade (see: Ghostzapper). His dam is a full sister to Tiznow, the only 2-time BC Classic winner. I think Paynter is just now coming into his own and you know Baffert wants to turn the tables on I’ll Have Another. He’s also likely to be a good price as a 4th choice behind IHA, Dullahan, and Rags.

Street Life was my sleeper horse after I saw him a late-running 3rd in the Peter Pan Stakes at Belmont. His route to Belmont went through Belmont the same way that Drosselmeyer did two years ago. By Street Sense out of a Grindstone mare (Derby winners top and bottom), he also has the pedigree to run long and could definitely be a spoiler. I’ve reevaluated my initial opinion of him somewhat (having liked him more last week) but mostly because I like Dullahan and Paynter more than I did. I do love his Twitter handle, however (@DeepCloser) – more creative connections than most.

As for the other contenders, I could see either of the Oaklawn runners (Optimizer, Atigun) cracking the deep exotics if the race completely falls apart. I’m not leaving Union Rags out of all my supers because he is a really good horse but don’t see him adding a ton of value overall.

Betting Strategy for the 2012 Belmont

Big bet on I’ll Have Another to PLACE ($2 Souvenir to WIN)

Decent Bet on Paynter to WIN/PLACE at 8-1 or better. (AND SHOW at 10-1 or higher)

Decent EXACTA BOX IHA/Dullahan/Paynter

Small TRIFECTA BOX IHA/Dull/Payn/Street Life

Larger TRI KEY with  IHA over D/P/SL, Smaller with Paynter over IHA/D/SL

Various $0.10 SUPER BOXes and KEYs, leaning on IHA/D/P in top 2 slots and stretching to ALL in 4th

Good luck. Let’s go I’ll Have Another!

110 Yards – Previewing the 2012 Preakness Stakes

110 yards. That’s the difference in the length between the Kentucky Derby and the Preakness Stakes. 1/16 of a mile. Half a furlong. The fastest humans can run that distance in about 11 seconds – the fastest fresh racehorses can cover it about half that time (5.5s). But to a tired thoroughbred having already run 9.5 furlongs, they may take 6.5s to cover that last bit of ground. And when it comes to handicapping the Preakness, that 110 yards might as well be a mile.

I point you to the official Brisnet chart of the 2012 Kentucky Derby. In that last furlong, I’ll Have Another made up 3 lengths on Bodemeister to win by a neck. If a second is equivalent to 5 lengths, IHA ran the last furlong just .6 seconds faster than Bodemeister. Everything else equal (which is almost never the case in horse racing), had the Derby been 110 yards shorter, the curse of Apollo may be history, Bodemeister the winner by up to a 1/2 length.

Which brings me to my major point about handicapping the Preakness – toss out your Derby handicapping and start fresh. The Preakness, like its beer-swilling mascot Kegasus, is a whole ‘nother animal.


In my Kentucky Derby analysis, I laid out some rules that I used to make my picks (that turned out profitable, I might add). The “rules” for the Preakness are different, but recent history illuminates some trends.

  1. Pedigree disqualifies fewer horses. Tossing A.P. Indy and Storm Cat line horses really helped me narrow the Derby field. For the Preakness, all lines have won in recent memory (Foresty, by Storm Cat, sired Shackleford, last year’s winner) so no penalty to my handicapping.
  2. Horses with good pedigrees for the Derby win the Derby. Good horses win the Preakness. Smarty Jones, Afleet Alex, Bernadini, Curlin, Big Brown, Rachel Alexandra, Lookin at Lucky, Shackleford. Not a bad group. 7 3Yo Eclipse winners, 2 HOYs. All save Smarty won subsequent graded stakes races. Interestingly, however, only 3 won at 10f or longer ever again (AA, Bernadini, Curlin). The rest were best at nine furlongs; Shackleford probably 7-8f. Point’s this: a shorter (8-9f) pedigree can win the Preakness, and has the last few years.
  3. The Preakness can be won on the lead; a horse cannot get too far back and win. Rachel and Shackleford won on the lead, the rest were close at the quarter pole. My point above, that making up ground on a shorter stretch, is more difficult against a confirmed front-runner that can get (or has gotten) nine furlongs in the past. Animal Kingdom made a nice run at the end last year, but Shackleford was already too far ahead.
  4. For Derby horses running back in the Preakness, bad trips only count against them if it took them out of their preferred running style. Lookin at Lucky liked to stalk the lead but got boxed in on the rail and had to come from way back. With fewer horses and a better post, he cruised in the Preakness. I would not necessarily move up a closer who got a bad closing trip.
  5. New shooters need to be really good to have a chance. Only 3 Preakness winners  in the last 15 years did not run in the Derby and two were named Bernadini and Rachel Alexandra. There are none of those in here.

The Preakness is not as great a betting race as the Derby because the legitimate win contenders are fewer, most of whom are known quantities coming out of the Derby. Even the exactas are chalky. Now, you might point to the 13-1 score that Shackleford delivered over Animal Kingdom in 2011, but even he was a top 4-5 play based on his Derby and running style. In 2012, I expect there to be even fewer surprises.

Tier 1 – Win Contenders – Bodemeister and I’ll Have Another

I could attempt to be overly clever and trip handicap the Kentucky Derby to try to find a horse that’s going to pay better than 5-2 at the Preakness. I don’t think that horse is in this field. I’ll Have Another and Bodemeister are my top 2 win contenders based on on their performances in the Derby and the overall strength of their resumes. In the Derby, their 9.5 furlongs were all but equal. Separating them again on the third Saturday of May may prove equally difficult.

I expect Bodemeister to be the Preakness favorite as his Derby race, and not I’ll Have Another’s, got the most raves. After I saw his Arkansas Derby, I tweeted that I thought Bodemeister would win the Preakness. The association to Afleet Alex and Curlin was very strong in my mind. His game, front-running, second in the Derby, however, reminded me more of Hard Spun, who lead every classic race he ran, but never sealed the deal. Bodemeister’s brilliance will likely make him the lowest price on the board at 2-1.

Because of his style and brilliance, he is also a riskier bet for those low odds. His best absolutely wins this, but will he bounce off that Derby effort? Or was his Derby effort a bounce from Arkansas, as brilliant as it was? Bob Baffert would not be sending him to Baltimore if he did not think he could win. He has a lot of confidence in his horse, but then again…

…so does Doug O’neil. A lot has been made of I’ll Have Another’s “perfect trip” in the Derby, but that trip is exactly a product of how IHA wants to run. He likes to use his natural speed to be forwardly placed, but can stalk a true speed horse like Bodemeister. IHA should once again be among the 2nd group of horses chasing Bode, though he can neither let him get too far ahead or set easy fractions. I’m pretty certain IHA will be the 5-2 second choice, which is a pretty good value.

I really see two scenarios: if Bode wins, IHA is a clear second among every other horse. If IHA wins, Bode may not have gotten the trip he wanted and the next tier of horses is in play.

Betting Strategy: IHA to win at 5-2 or better, equal weighted straight exacta on Bode-IHA, and various exotics keying IHA or Bode over IHA.

Tier 2 – Top Exotics Candidates – Creative Cause, Went the Day Well, Daddy Nose Best, Liaison

These candidates finished 5th, 4th and 6th respectively in the Kentucky Derby and only WtDW did not get the trip he was looking for. (He came from far back to grab 4th.) Based on that finish, I’m expecting WtDW to be the “wiseguy” Preakness horse, and may be the 3rd choice between 6-1 and 9-1. I think this is a mistake. WtDW closed into a fast pace where all the frontrunners but Bodemeister backed up into the pack. His wide move saved him a lot of pain. I also think he, like Dullahan, had a Derby-specific pedigree edge.

For that reason, I like Creative Cause as a strong top-3 candidate and even top-2 if Bode falters in the stretch. CC has missed the board only once (the Derby) and should like the shorter going here. His duel with IHA in the SA Derby shows he’s got all the class he needs. The best case scenario for good payoffs has CC nosing out IHA with Bode off-the-board. I like that scenario enough to play a small trifecta or super on it.

Daddy Nose Best is a late entry but gets Julien Leparoux back, his pilot for both GSWs this year. He beat decent horses at Sunland and I could see him getting a share here. The “wiseguy” tag washed off him pretty quick after the Derby, so we may expect better odds.

I add Liaison here because he seems like a horse rediscovering his form for top connections. I could see the son of Indian Charlie with a consistent run for a 3rd or 4th place finish. Given the split between Martin Garcia and Bob Baffert, I’m not sure who’s going to get the call.

Tier 3 – Long Odds, Short Chances – Zetterholm, Optimizer, Teeth of the Dog, Tiger Walk, Cozzetti, Pretension

Theoretically, all of these horses should be 25-1 plus but I’m notoriously bad at figuring out the betting public on longshots. Optimizer and Cozzetti have already finished multiple lengths back of Bodemeister at nine furlongs. Cozzetti – being by Cozzene, a strong stamina influence – should have waited for the Belmont, but his trainer is sending Dullahan there next month. Optimizer gets a new jockey, Corey Nakatani, but I think his future’s on grass.

Teeth of the Dog and Tiger Walk finished behind Alpha and Gemologist who did nothing in Kentucky. Each has a pedigree for more distance, however, and could figure on the bottom of some tickets.

Zetterholm is interesting insofar as he’s an unknown quantity against graded competition but at least he has a winning streak to defend. I don’t think Pretension will show anything – an Illinois Derby 9th is not going to get it done.

I will celebrate the fact that the Preakness has dime supers – unlike the Kentucky Derby – which means I can afford pressing the ALL button once or twice.

Final Analysis

Part of betting the races is finding value where you can. The I’ll Have Another – Bodemeister exacta will never again pay $300. It might pay $17. Still, the race scenario where Bode doesn’t bring his best may pay handsomely and could set up a shot at the Triple Crown. That’s the angle I’ll play (aside from the odds being screwy, like Bode at 4- or 5-1) – the Santa Anita Derby runners going 1-2 again.

I’ll Have Another, Creative Cause, Bodemeister, Went the Day Well. Good luck.